A fresh political controversy has emerged in Assam after Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma strongly rejected allegations made by the Congress against his wife, Riniki Bhuyan Sharma. The dispute intensified when Sarma alleged a “Pakistan angle” behind the claims, adding a new dimension to the ongoing political confrontation.
The issue began when Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera presented documents during a press conference, alleging discrepancies in Riniki Bhuyan Sharma’s financial and personal disclosures. According to the Congress, the documents included images of three passports purportedly issued in her name by the United Arab Emirates, Antigua and Barbuda, and Egypt. Additionally, the party claimed there were undisclosed assets, including properties in the UAE and a company registered in Wyoming, United States.
The Congress further alleged that these assets and affiliations were not declared in Sarma’s official affidavit, raising questions about transparency and compliance with legal disclosure requirements. The claims quickly gained traction, drawing national attention and sparking debate across political circles.
Responding to the allegations, Chief Minister Sarma categorically denied all claims, calling the documents “fabricated” and “malicious.” He asserted that the materials presented by the Congress were doctored and intended to mislead the public. Sarma emphasized that neither his wife nor his family had engaged in any wrongdoing.
In a significant escalation, Sarma introduced a “Pakistan angle,” suggesting that the origin or manipulation of the documents could involve external interference. While he did not provide detailed evidence publicly, he stated that the central government had taken the matter seriously and reached out to the governments of three countries to verify the authenticity of the documents in question.
This development has added a geopolitical dimension to what initially appeared to be a domestic political dispute. Sarma’s remarks indicate that the matter may extend beyond party politics and could involve international verification processes.
Meanwhile, the Congress has maintained its stance, insisting that the documents are credible and warrant a thorough investigation. The party has called for accountability and transparency, urging authorities to examine the allegations independently.
Political analysts note that such high-stakes exchanges are likely to influence the broader political narrative, especially in the run-up to key elections. The controversy also underscores the growing trend of leveraging documents and digital evidence in political battles, raising concerns about authenticity, verification, and the potential for misinformation.
As the situation unfolds, all eyes are on official investigations and responses from the countries involved. Whether the claims are substantiated or dismissed, the episode highlights the importance of due diligence, transparency, and credible evidence in public discourse.
The coming days are expected to bring further clarity as authorities assess the validity of the documents and the claims surrounding them. Until then, the political standoff continues to dominate headlines, reflecting the intense rivalry between the ruling party and the opposition.